First, let me just say that when I came up with my list of books that I read in 2005 and that were published in 2005, the list was not very long. With school, I haven't had the chance to read as much as I'd like. But that will surely change now that I don't have homework to worry about. Therefore, I have limited myself to five books. Obviously these are taken from books that I actually read so no doubt I missed some wonderful books.
1. Chainfire by Terry Goodkind
I have been an admirer of the Sword of Truth series since I first read Wizard's First Rule year ago. That said, some of the books are better than others and it's a long and complicated series. For the first books Goodkind says that he didn't know what was going to happen in the next book as the wrote. I believe this more for some of the earlier books because there is evidence of this in the plot, but nevertheless there is an overarching storyline in the form of a villain. Anyway, I was disappointed with the last installment Naked Empire because of all the preaching that took place in it. Because the later books especially do seem to grander scheme, this one didn't seem to stand on its own as much and I felt lacked forward momentum. Chainfire is completely different (the cover design changes to go along with this). Because of the conflict in this book the focus of the story changes. I thought it was a brilliant problem to throw at Richard and Khalan. I couldn't put it down and there is a definite question of whether things will work out, which is sometimes missing from the other books because Richard and Khalan are both such strong, resourceful characters. If you haven't read Terry Goodkind before, start with the beginning. If you stopped reading after a few books, you may be able to pick the story up again with this one, but like I said, it is a complicated series. But this one is worth reading them all for.
2. Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince by J.K. Rowling
You've all heard about this book by now. Rowling is a master at plot twists and this one has them, but the book feels less complete than the others of the series. I've only read it once (shame on me, I know!) but the book was rather traumatic to finish because of the ending and the wait and the inevitable let down once I finished reading it. I feel the same after most "events" in my life from holidays to being in a theater production. I do plan on reading it again soon. I thought in comparison to other books Harry learned a lot but did less. But I guess the last couple of chapters make up for that. And of course I was thrilled with the romantic developments. Overall, Rowling as done it again and added another fantastic installment to her series.
3. The Hallowed Hunt by Lois McMaster Bujold
Anything by this author is wonderful. I highly recommend reading everything she's ever written. The only reason this book isn't higher on the list is because I thought the climax could have been paced better.
4. Mystic and Rider by Sharon Shinn
Shinn is a subtle writer. It is a nice change from a lot of the other writers out there. The main character keeps her secrets for most of the book from the reader and the other characters. Religious prejudice, political intrigue and romance woven throughout. I thought the love story could have been more center stage, but I guess I'm not subtle! lol. Anyway, I highly recommend.
5. Shaman's Crossing by Robin Hobb
A new world for the popular author of The tawny Man series. This first is a coming-of-age story set against a world where there is conflict between two societies the "civilized" and the "primitive." The story is told in first person POV and follows a young man through is childhood on the frontier, his encounters with the Plainspeople and their magic, and his experiences at the school where he trains to become a soldier. I'm looking forward to seeing where the series goes.
I also recommend:
A Brother's Price by Wen Spencer
At All Costs by David Weber
The Prodigal Troll by Charles Coleman Finlay
Biggest disappointment of the year:
The Historian by Elizabeth Kostova
I still think the concept is intriguing, but the voice and style distanced me from the main character too much. I wasn't able to read very far before putting it down. From the hype that the book got I was expecting something much more exciting. Hopefully, I'll be able to finish the book at some point, then maybe my opinion will change.
That's all for now!
Wednesday, December 21, 2005
Sunday, December 18, 2005
KING KONG
GO SEE THIS MOVIE!!!
It's a long movie, but well worth it. Exciting and touching. I have to admit that it made me cry.
I was fortunate enough to see the original last Saturday and I think that added to my experience seeing this verison, instead of taking away. There are some jokes that you won't get unless you see the original movie and even though I like the first movie, I feel that Peter Jackson's version blows the old one away, but without stomping all over it. The original plot is followed pretty closely, but everything about the new movie is more intense. The action, the characterization, the acting, King Kong (Go Andy Serkis!!!). And like I said, it made me cry, so if you're a softy, bring tissues.
Warning for people who scare easily (or people who are creeped out by bugs and worms): There are scenes that might scare and/or really creep you out. So be warned. There isn't any real blood and guts, but you will definitely be reminded that Peter Jackson originally made horror films.
I think my only complaint about the movie is that there are Heart of Darkness references that I don't think the movie really needed. But perhaps I'm biased because that's one of the books I never finished reading for one of my English classes in high school, so the references pretty much went over my head anyway. lol. But that's a very small part of the movie.
Highly recommended!
It's a long movie, but well worth it. Exciting and touching. I have to admit that it made me cry.
I was fortunate enough to see the original last Saturday and I think that added to my experience seeing this verison, instead of taking away. There are some jokes that you won't get unless you see the original movie and even though I like the first movie, I feel that Peter Jackson's version blows the old one away, but without stomping all over it. The original plot is followed pretty closely, but everything about the new movie is more intense. The action, the characterization, the acting, King Kong (Go Andy Serkis!!!). And like I said, it made me cry, so if you're a softy, bring tissues.
Warning for people who scare easily (or people who are creeped out by bugs and worms): There are scenes that might scare and/or really creep you out. So be warned. There isn't any real blood and guts, but you will definitely be reminded that Peter Jackson originally made horror films.
I think my only complaint about the movie is that there are Heart of Darkness references that I don't think the movie really needed. But perhaps I'm biased because that's one of the books I never finished reading for one of my English classes in high school, so the references pretty much went over my head anyway. lol. But that's a very small part of the movie.
Highly recommended!
Friday, December 16, 2005
Reflections on the semester
The semester is finally over. I handed in my last few assignments yesterday and sometime soon the fact that I'm actually finished and graduating will sink in. Until then, I can at least reflect on this past semester and what I've learned.
1. Reading classic or influential writers and trying to emmulate their writing can help you learn a lot. We read Gustave Flaubert's Madame Bovary, Ernest Hemingway's In Our Time and Virginia Woolf's To the Lighthouse. I think I got some good material from the exercises I did for class, some of which really forced me to sit down and think about description, which, as one of my weaknesses, was very good for me.
2. When I am distracted by things that are going on (or a person who isn't going on) in my personal life, it is very difficult for me to write anything not required for class.
3. I can be anal-retentive when in comes to completeing homework assignments, especially ones involving improving my own work. This is a good quality when it comes to revision.
4. A query letter and a synopsis are much harder to write than it would seem.
5. Short stories still aren't my favorite thing to read or write, but I do respect ones written well.
6. Getting published is very hard to do and requires not only good writing, but most of the time luck as well. This doesn't keep me from believing that it will happen to me someday.
These are just some highlights. I actually learned a lot more. I'm sad that I won't have the chance to keep learning, but I can't stay in school forever; it's too expensive.
Now I'll have a lot more free time to do things I haven't had time to do, like theater and reading. I can write more and start the huge project which is revision. I need to finish my Web site. I guess once the holidays are over, I'll still have plenty to do, I just won't be graded on it.
1. Reading classic or influential writers and trying to emmulate their writing can help you learn a lot. We read Gustave Flaubert's Madame Bovary, Ernest Hemingway's In Our Time and Virginia Woolf's To the Lighthouse. I think I got some good material from the exercises I did for class, some of which really forced me to sit down and think about description, which, as one of my weaknesses, was very good for me.
2. When I am distracted by things that are going on (or a person who isn't going on) in my personal life, it is very difficult for me to write anything not required for class.
3. I can be anal-retentive when in comes to completeing homework assignments, especially ones involving improving my own work. This is a good quality when it comes to revision.
4. A query letter and a synopsis are much harder to write than it would seem.
5. Short stories still aren't my favorite thing to read or write, but I do respect ones written well.
6. Getting published is very hard to do and requires not only good writing, but most of the time luck as well. This doesn't keep me from believing that it will happen to me someday.
These are just some highlights. I actually learned a lot more. I'm sad that I won't have the chance to keep learning, but I can't stay in school forever; it's too expensive.
Now I'll have a lot more free time to do things I haven't had time to do, like theater and reading. I can write more and start the huge project which is revision. I need to finish my Web site. I guess once the holidays are over, I'll still have plenty to do, I just won't be graded on it.
Thursday, December 15, 2005
Movies based on...
Two books and a musical
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
What can I say? Awesome!!
Yeah, they had to cut a lot of the book, but I always thought the book was little loose (don't get me wrong, I loved the book, but compared to Azkaban? It was just not as tight.) The movie, though, tension, excitement, dragons, a duel with Voldemort! and Ray Fiennes! I can't even begin...he's so...evil!
I'm going to see it again at an IMAX theater soon, so after that I hope to have a more balanced review (i.e. less raving and more thought).
Rent
First off, I have to say that I've never been one of those HUGE Rent fans. I have seen it (in Baltimore) and I did like it, but I've never obsessively listen to the soundtrack like I do for say... Wicked. That said, I support all movie-musicals and enjoyed Moulin Rouge (even though it wasn't really a musical), Chicago and Phantom of the Opera.
As for this movie, I thought it was great. There were some music that was cut, but (like in Phantom) it was mostly things that if the genre the composer was working in wasn't totally sung, it would have been dialogue anyway and in the movie is therefore spoken. An example is those annoying phone messages from parents. What has been added are mostly images that form memories that couldn't have been portrayed in the stage musical. I feel they add more depth to the characters.
The music is, of course, awesome. I highly recommend.
The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
These books (although not this one specifically, I like the later ones better) were hands down my favorites as a pre-teen. I had high expectations for this movie (my #1 to look forward to, even above the above two) and I was not disappointed. As in most movies based on books, it was streamlined a little I felt. There was not as much walking as I remember. There was at least one scene that was changed, but it didn't take away from the experience for me. The girl who played Lucy was fantastic and the Witch was perfect. Edmund admirably goes through his character's process of redemption. I think the young actor will be up to the task of the next few books. Peter and Susan were also good.
I agree with one reviewer who didn't like the cute "old married couple" interaction of Mr. and Mrs. Beaver. Although I wasn't annoyed and found a lot of it funny, the original characters don't need it and the point is that the animals are not cute and funny, they're real people--the movie missed that a little. I also thought the special effects were great, thought the battle swordplay wasn't up to Lord of the Rings standards. But what do you expect when your warrior is a boy? Peter is no Aragorn, that's all, and I don't think there was any way to really make him so.
I think my favorite character in the movie was Mr. Tumnus. I thought the actor (along with costumes and special effects) did such a wonderful job with him.
As for the Christian allegory. I think the movie portrays it like the books did. If you notice it and you are a Christian, it may add an additional layer of meaning for you. If you don't notice it and/or are not a Christian I don't think it should take away from the story. Sacrifice and redemption are not themes limited to Christianity, after all. As far as I can tell neither the book or the movie beats you over the head with it.
Highly recommended!!!
Coming Soon: Revised opinion of the new Harry Potter, King Kong (I recently watched the original movie and enjoyed that) and hopefully, Memoirs of a Geisha (which I haven't read) and The Producers (I haven't seen or listened to the music).
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
What can I say? Awesome!!
Yeah, they had to cut a lot of the book, but I always thought the book was little loose (don't get me wrong, I loved the book, but compared to Azkaban? It was just not as tight.) The movie, though, tension, excitement, dragons, a duel with Voldemort! and Ray Fiennes! I can't even begin...he's so...evil!
I'm going to see it again at an IMAX theater soon, so after that I hope to have a more balanced review (i.e. less raving and more thought).
Rent
First off, I have to say that I've never been one of those HUGE Rent fans. I have seen it (in Baltimore) and I did like it, but I've never obsessively listen to the soundtrack like I do for say... Wicked. That said, I support all movie-musicals and enjoyed Moulin Rouge (even though it wasn't really a musical), Chicago and Phantom of the Opera.
As for this movie, I thought it was great. There were some music that was cut, but (like in Phantom) it was mostly things that if the genre the composer was working in wasn't totally sung, it would have been dialogue anyway and in the movie is therefore spoken. An example is those annoying phone messages from parents. What has been added are mostly images that form memories that couldn't have been portrayed in the stage musical. I feel they add more depth to the characters.
The music is, of course, awesome. I highly recommend.
The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
These books (although not this one specifically, I like the later ones better) were hands down my favorites as a pre-teen. I had high expectations for this movie (my #1 to look forward to, even above the above two) and I was not disappointed. As in most movies based on books, it was streamlined a little I felt. There was not as much walking as I remember. There was at least one scene that was changed, but it didn't take away from the experience for me. The girl who played Lucy was fantastic and the Witch was perfect. Edmund admirably goes through his character's process of redemption. I think the young actor will be up to the task of the next few books. Peter and Susan were also good.
I agree with one reviewer who didn't like the cute "old married couple" interaction of Mr. and Mrs. Beaver. Although I wasn't annoyed and found a lot of it funny, the original characters don't need it and the point is that the animals are not cute and funny, they're real people--the movie missed that a little. I also thought the special effects were great, thought the battle swordplay wasn't up to Lord of the Rings standards. But what do you expect when your warrior is a boy? Peter is no Aragorn, that's all, and I don't think there was any way to really make him so.
I think my favorite character in the movie was Mr. Tumnus. I thought the actor (along with costumes and special effects) did such a wonderful job with him.
As for the Christian allegory. I think the movie portrays it like the books did. If you notice it and you are a Christian, it may add an additional layer of meaning for you. If you don't notice it and/or are not a Christian I don't think it should take away from the story. Sacrifice and redemption are not themes limited to Christianity, after all. As far as I can tell neither the book or the movie beats you over the head with it.
Highly recommended!!!
Coming Soon: Revised opinion of the new Harry Potter, King Kong (I recently watched the original movie and enjoyed that) and hopefully, Memoirs of a Geisha (which I haven't read) and The Producers (I haven't seen or listened to the music).
Wednesday, December 07, 2005
I think it's working now
I was just about asleep last night when inspiration struck! So of course i had to wake up and write for an hour. The problem was that I was trying to write the story the way I always have, but just alternating viewpoints in one scene. That wasn't working. What I did was take a step back and added some distance, a narrator-type voice at the beginning of the piece and that helped me slide into what I think will work in terms of character thoughts and emotions. I didn't get as far as I would have liked (it was late!) but there was definitely forward progress and I think i now have a section good enough to read in our Virginia Wolfe class on Thursday.
Now, I just need to finish the story while making sure to include some "stillness" description and counterpoint a la Flaubert and Madame Bovary and some layered detail description a la Hemingway. I don't think my language will be the same as Hemingway, necessarily, that might now fit the piece, but I think I can use the technique. Maybe. If not, the other stuff should be enough.
I'm actually getting excited! I'm happy about that because it's been awhile. I always let my personal life have too much influence on my writing life. But I will not bore anyone with all that here.
Now, I just need to finish the story while making sure to include some "stillness" description and counterpoint a la Flaubert and Madame Bovary and some layered detail description a la Hemingway. I don't think my language will be the same as Hemingway, necessarily, that might now fit the piece, but I think I can use the technique. Maybe. If not, the other stuff should be enough.
I'm actually getting excited! I'm happy about that because it's been awhile. I always let my personal life have too much influence on my writing life. But I will not bore anyone with all that here.
Monday, December 05, 2005
So I don't think my short story is working...
Last week I set a goal to either write something new or rewrite something significantly for my class tonight. I started writing a short story that I've been thinking about for awhile now (it covers a significant event in the back story of one of the characters in my novel). I also decided that I would use this short story to display all the nifty techniques we learned in my other class, including the shifting emotional consciousness of Virginia Wolfe's To the Lighthouse.
So far, I don't think it's working very well. I've never written from a more omniscient-like POV before (i.e. shifting from one character's head to another's in one scene). I usually write in third person, but stay with one character for a whole scene. Anyway, I don't like what I have so far. I don't know if that's because I'm not getting the inner voices of the characters right, or if it's too choppy. There's something wrong. Which is all right because I don't have to turn the story in for grading until next Thursday (but that's along with 2 other things I haven't started yet, sigh).
But tonight I have to give what I have writen now over for my other class to look at and pretend they are editors. In a way, that's good, because I may get some useful comments. But in another way that's bad because they might not like it and then I'll feel bummed.
And I've been feeling bummed a lot recently. And for no good reason at all.
Ok, bright side. They probably won't hate it. I'm not getting graded on it or anything. I can completely change it if it doesn't go over well. I should NOT let myself get worked up over this. I must remember to breathe.
So far, I don't think it's working very well. I've never written from a more omniscient-like POV before (i.e. shifting from one character's head to another's in one scene). I usually write in third person, but stay with one character for a whole scene. Anyway, I don't like what I have so far. I don't know if that's because I'm not getting the inner voices of the characters right, or if it's too choppy. There's something wrong. Which is all right because I don't have to turn the story in for grading until next Thursday (but that's along with 2 other things I haven't started yet, sigh).
But tonight I have to give what I have writen now over for my other class to look at and pretend they are editors. In a way, that's good, because I may get some useful comments. But in another way that's bad because they might not like it and then I'll feel bummed.
And I've been feeling bummed a lot recently. And for no good reason at all.
Ok, bright side. They probably won't hate it. I'm not getting graded on it or anything. I can completely change it if it doesn't go over well. I should NOT let myself get worked up over this. I must remember to breathe.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)